Keen-Weinberger debate

There's been some buzz on the debate between Andrew Keen and David Weinberger at the Supernova conference and in the WSJ. It's an interesting and weird discussion in many ways. At Supernova Weinberger gives an interesting overview of handling analogue and digital information. Ending up in "digitalizing everything" and having users organize it.
I find it disappointing that he didn't go into the fact(?) that not everything will be digitalized. Remember "The myth of the paperless office"? We live in a mixed world, with paper and digital information, with structured and unstructured information. The real question is: how do we cope with that, how do we organize this way of living, can it be done? Furthermore, I simply can't seem to understand the point Keen is making. Every time Keen says/writes something I came up with an answer (except for the points that Weinberger agrees with such as "authority on the web"). And, funny enough, Weinberger gives the same answers I would give (only of course more elaborate, as an expert - which I am not - would do). (Also refer to Snowden's short post on this debate.) Example: in the WSJ article Keen says:

But once everthing is flattened, when books are digitized, when libraries becomes adjuncts of Google, when writers are transformed into sales and marketing reps of their own brands, what then?

What then?! This won't become reality, as far as I see it. Why? Because we see more books being published (also due to the fact that books can be published more easily). It's also a fact that you sell more books if you put (part of) your book on the Web (too). (Up until about a year ago print volumes continued to grow.)

So I (mostly) agree with Weinberger and not with Keen? Yes and no. Yes, I agree with what Weinberger is stating. But I'm also intrigued by what Keen is saying and questioning myself: Am I missing something? Keen's story relates to my earlier post about Sanger's "Who says we know". I had the same weird experience when I read Sanger's essay: I don't agree with the statement that's being made, but still...