Using TimeBridge

Well, I’ve been using TimeBridge for some time now. And I’d like to let you know what I think about it.

As I said, TimeBridge really fills the gaps that Outlook (2003) has. For instance, being able to propose options for a meeting to a group of people is great.

TimeBridge’s user interface is wonderfully designed. Very intuitive, you can get to work right away. I also like the workflow approach to making an meeting(request). The user interface takes you through a couple of basic steps in a helpful way. Selecting options in your agenda and the people you want to invite is easy too. And I love the feature that the people you invite can say if the option is ‘best’, ‘ok’ or ‘not possible’. A meeting proposal in Outlook is all or nothing, accept or decline. And people hate to decline, but it looks like there not cooperative. Oh, yes, you can ‘propose a different date/time’, but you’re not the person setting up the meeting right?

But then comes the part I’m not quite satisfied with. When you select your options you’d like to look in your Outlook Calender and see what timeslots are open. This is not possible (yet?). You can import your Outlook Calender to TimeBridge, but I don’t want to do that. Outlook is my main Calender, not TimeBridge. Even from the Outlook plugin you can’t look in Outlook.

Well, OK, say we take this for granted and just flip between Outlook and the TimeBridge website to check for open slots. Then, still, there’s another thing I don’t like. What’s the problem? Ok, you’ve sent out your meeting proposal and get back replies from the people you want to meet with. Then you choose the best option. This option is sent to all invitees. I was thinking that the meeting was now also put in Outlook or could easily be put in Outlook via a sync feature. But you can’t. You have to download an ical file, open this file and it’s in your Outlook Calender. I find this too difficult.

Hopefully the people at TimeBridge will add the feature I miss.

Anyway, I’m enthusiastic about this tool. As I said before, this should be standard functionility in Outlook (and every Calender tool). And I hope it will be soon. With TimeBridge leading the way.

Comments

  1. AnonymousSeptember 5, 2007 at 7:26 PM

    Samuel: Thanks for your comments on TimeBridge's interaction. The good news is that the thing you want is available right now!

    Let me clarify: If you use the TimeBridge Connector for Outlook, which is a small download. You can see your calendar details in the TimeBridge schedule while your propose times, just as you'd like. But we do NOT upload the contents, nor do we want to replace your calendar. Rather we want to work with what you use--- right now we support Outlook and Google calendars in this way but expect to support others in the next few months.

    Also we hold the proposed times on your Outlook calendar and then remove them, leaving only the confirmed time, once the time is set.

    And you can share your availability so that others (on TimeBridge or not) can see when you are free or busy. This makes it easier for them to schedule time with you. If they are connected TimeBridge users, they can reciprocate.

    Hope this makes things clearer but based on your post it sounds like we have just what you need (and want!) Let us know how it goes. We love feedback here at TimeBridge.
    John

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownSeptember 8, 2007 at 2:15 PM

    Thanks for the comment, John. I had the Connector from the beginning. And I was hoping the Connector would address my problem... But I didn't get it to work in the way I wanted/expected. I'll try again and let you know what happened. Is there a video/flash demo on this issue?

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownSeptember 13, 2007 at 2:45 PM

    Just check if I was mistaken about the connection with Outlook. I don't think I was. What I meant was that when I'm selecting time slot in the Timebridge calendar, I can't look in Outlook directly whether those slots are already filled. The Outlook plugin only take you to the Timebridge site, but doesn't really integrate with the Outlook calendar (yet?).

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownSeptember 20, 2007 at 4:39 PM

    Samuel:

    Sorry for the delayed response...

    Let me give you a couple links that may help you.

    Yori giving a short product demo: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuj0P-SNwPk

    A great overview from demogirl:http://flash.screeniac.com/timebridge-dg/timebridge-dg.html?TB_iframe=true&height=590&width=1050

    Perhaps there's an issue w/ the way your Connector is working. If so you can email us at support@timebridge.com and we'll help get you up and running! The good news is you should be able to do what you want to do (if I'm hearing you correctly).
    - John

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJune 16, 2009 at 12:08 PM

    It's a very nice blog
    architects in bangalore , architects in bangalore , interior designers in Bangalore , interior designers in Bangalore , architects in bangalore , architects in bangalore , interior designers in bangalore

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment! Just log in using one of the formats and if you want me to get back to you. Otherwise comment anonymously.

Popular posts

Keep the Intranet Small

Image
This tweet by Jonathan Phillips ( @digitaljonathan ) triggered to finalize this post, that's been burning in my draft box. I've always been intrigued by how unsuccessful many intranets are. And there are all kinds of good reasons for intranet failure. One of the things that is hardly ever mentioned is: Shouldn't the intranet be smaller? Usually intranets are huge. Lots and lots of pages with lots and lots of content. With complex navigation. The intranet  evaluation surveys almost always show employees only use the news page and people finder. But still we build and maintain nice big intranets. Not only stats point to smaller intranets. There are others reasons as well. I came up with a few. If you have more, just leave a comment. Here's my list: -            user requirements: users don't require large intranet -            search/navigation: searching and navigating a small ...
Read more

Enterprise 2.0 Research

Image
There's not too much fundamental research on Enterprise 2.0. Deloitte recently published interesting research done on enterprise 2.0 implementations and their return-on-investment. In the EU research has also done as well. Study is being done for the European Commission and it was carried out by Tech4i2, IDC and Headshift. What was the goal of the study? Goals of the study To provide a clear definition of Enterprise 2.0 is, describe the market and the positioning of EU industry, also in comparison with US and Asia; To analyze the take-up of Enterprise 2.0, the organizational requirements, and the role on the transition to a knowledge based low-carbon economy; To collect evidence on its macro-economic impact, as a market opportunity for the European Software industry and as a productivity tool for European business; To identify and analyse both the direct and contextual challenges, including the need for Next Generation Access and the legal barriers; To analyse an...
Read more

Innovation in Turbulent Times

Image
I love reading articles about innovation. And every now and then you read one that is very interesting. "Innovation in Turbulent Times" by Rigby, Gruver, Allen (in HBR, June 2009) is one of them. This article takes fashion companies as an example for continuous, year-by-year innovation. And how successful fashion companies are usually led by two people: a left-brainer and a right-brainer. "If you don't have highly creative people in positions of real authority, you won't get innovation. Most companies in other industries ignore this lesson." They extend this to show that successful non-fashion companies have the same kind of leadership. And this kind of leadership is usually also characterized by a long-term relationship. I think this concept can also be extended to teams and projects as well. More often than not, people are good at one or the other: thinking up great concepts or ideas, or, making them. In teams and projects we can learn from this as...
Read more